Codex vs Claude Code vs Cursor: Who Wins, Who Loses | Will All Coding Be Automated - Do We Need PMs | The Real Bottleneck to AGI
Posted by
Alexander Embiricos is the Head of Codex at OpenAI, leading the development of the company's flagship AI coding systems that power automated software generation, debugging and developer workflows. Under his leadership, Codex has become one of the most widely adopted AI developer platforms.
In Today's Episode We Discuss:
Will Coding Be Automated? Why AI Could Create More Engineers, Not Fewer
Do We Need PMs? The "Undefined" Product Role and When It Matters
The Real AGI Bottleneck: Human Prompting, Validation, and "Too Much Effort"
Three Phases of Agents: Coding → Computer Use → Productized Workflows
Enterprise Reality Check: Security, Permissions, and Safe Agentic Browsing
Is Inference the New Sales and Marketing?
What % of Codex Was Written by AI?
Do OpenAI Use AI for Code Review?
Is there any stickiness to AI coding tools?
What Does "Winning" Mean at OpenAI? Mission, Competition, and Moats
The Future UI: Chat or Voice
Agent-to-Agent Workflows: Designing for Approvals, Compliance, and Automation
Do Coding Models Have a Data Moat?
How does Codex View Data: Will They Build Their Own Mercor and Turing?
How Does Codex View Consumer: Will They Compete with Lovable?
Benchmarks vs "Vibes": How People Actually Judge Models
Cursor's Edge and the Case for Building Your Own Models
Is SaaS Dead? What Still Defends Value (Humans + Systems of Record)
Talent Wars and Career Advice for New Engineers in the AI Era
Guardrails, the Fully AI-Managed Stack, and a 10-Year Vision for Everyone
Share this post





